Deep Plane vs SMAS Facelift: How Is It Different?

The main difference between deep plane and SMAS facelifts lies in the surgical approach to the face’s underlying structures: a SMAS facelift lifts and tightens the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System by folding or trimming it, while a deep plane facelift works beneath this layer, releasing key facial ligaments to reposition the SMAS, fat, and skin together as one cohesive unit. This fundamental difference influences the areas that can be treated, the nature of results, and recovery time.

 

Understanding Facelift Techniques

 

What Is a SMAS Facelift?

The SMAS (Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System) is a fibrous network between the skin and deeper facial muscles that plays a crucial role in facial expression and structure. As we age, this layer stretches and descends, contributing to jowls and nasolabial folds.

 

A SMAS facelift directly addresses this layer:

  • The surgeon separates the skin from the SMAS after making incisions

  • The SMAS layer is lifted and tightened through plication (folding) or imbrication (removing a section)

  • This reinforcement provides support for the overlying skin, creating smoother contours in the lower face and jawline

 

What Is a Deep Plane Facelift?

The deep plane facelift operates within the anatomical space between the SMAS-muscle layer and the deeper expression muscles. Instead of separating skin from SMAS, the surgeon releases specific ligaments (zygomatic and masseteric) that tether the SMAS to deeper structures.

 

This technique allows lifting of skin, fat, and SMAS as a single composite flap. The result is a powerful vertical lift addressing:

  • Jowls and neck

  • Sagging mid-face and cheeks

  • Deep nasolabial folds

  • Loss of cheek volume

 

Customized Approach: Dr. Stephen Eric Metzinger tailors procedures based on his triple-board certification and extensive experience.

 

Comparing Deep Plane and SMAS Facelifts

The primary distinction lies in the plane of dissection:

 

SMAS Lift:

  • Two layers of dissection

  • Skin lifted off SMAS, then SMAS lifted separately

  • Works in the superficial plane

  • Tension is placed on the SMAS layer itself

  • Shorter operative time with clear anatomical landmarks

 

Deep Plane Lift:

  • One layer of dissection

  • Surgeon goes under the SMAS-muscle complex

  • Skin remains attached to the underlying muscle

  • Tension on deeper released tissues

  • Requires specialized training and longer operative time

 

Which Offers a More Comprehensive Lift?

Deep plane facelifts generally provide more comprehensive lifting by releasing ligaments tethering the mid-face:

  • Elevates sagging cheeks and malar fat pads

  • Softens deep nasolabial folds

  • Corrects prominent jowling

  • Redefines jawline and neck angle

  • Creates smoother transitions between facial regions

SMAS lifts excel at addressing:

  • Lower face and neck laxity

  • Early to moderate jowling

  • Patients without significant cheek sagging

 

Natural-Looking Results: Which Delivers Better Outcomes?

Both techniques produce beautiful, natural results when performed by an experienced surgeon. The deep plane has structural advantages:

  • Unified tissue movement preserves natural expressions

  • Vertical lift counteracts gravity anatomically

  • Avoids “pulled” or “windswept” appearance

  • Maintains the integrity of facial tissue relationships

SMAS lifts deliver natural results when surgeons:

  • Avoid over-tightening

  • Properly redrape skin

  • Respect natural tissue vectors

  • Apply deep anatomical knowledge

 

Procedure and Recovery

Both procedures require:

  • Anesthesia

  • Incisions hidden in the hairline and natural ear creases

  • Careful planning to minimize visible scarring

Key differences:

  • SMAS involves limited dissection in familiar planes

  • Deep plane requires extensive dissection around the facial nerves

  • Deep plane takes longer but allows more powerful repositioning

 

SMAS Facelift Recovery

Recovery timeline:

  • Initial results visible in 2-3 weeks

  • Return to work in 10-14 days

  • Final results develop over 3-6 months

  • Results last 8+ years with a healthy lifestyle

Recovery involves:

  • Swelling and bruising peaking on days 3-5

  • Compression garments

  • Specific sleeping positions

  • Feeling of tightness in the lower face and neck

 

Deep Plane Facelift Recovery

Recovery characteristics:

  • Similar timeline to SMAS

  • Potentially less bruising (avascular plane)

  • More initial swelling due to tissue mobilization

  • Less skin tension may improve scar healing

  • Most feel presentable after 2-3 weeks

Results often:

  • Appear more dramatic

  • Last 10-15 years

  • Continue settling beautifully over 6-12 months

  • Age more naturally over time

 

Choosing the Right Facelift for You

SMAS Facelift Candidates:

  • Ages 40s-60s typically

  • Good skin elasticity

  • Moderate jowling

  • Primarily lower face aging

  • Minimal midface descent

  • Prefer shorter recovery

 

Deep Plane Facelift Candidates:

  • Ages 50s-70s typically (individual anatomy matters more)

  • Advanced aging signs

  • Significant midface descent

  • Deep nasolabial folds

  • Loss of cheek volume

  • Seeking comprehensive, long-lasting results

  • Effective for both male and female patients

 

How to Decide Which Facelift Is Right for You

The decision requires thorough evaluation at our Metairie practice. Dr. Metzinger examines:

  • Facial structure and bone structure

  • Skin quality and elasticity

  • Muscle tone and ligament laxity

  • Fat distribution

  • Specific aging patterns

Additional considerations include:

  • Personal aesthetic goals

  • Lifestyle factors

  • Recovery time availability

  • Result expectations

 

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between a deep plane facelift and an SMAS facelift depends on your unique facial anatomy, aesthetic goals, and desired level of correction. While both techniques can deliver natural, rejuvenated results, a deep plane facelift may offer more comprehensive improvement for advanced facial aging and midface sagging, whereas a SMAS facelift is often ideal for patients seeking effective enhancement with a less extensive procedure.

 

Consulting with an experienced plastic surgeon like Dr. Metzinger is the best way to determine which approach will provide the most balanced, youthful, and long-lasting outcome for you.

About the Author

Dr. Stephen E. Metzinger

Dr. Metzinger is a Triple Board Certified Plastic Surgeon. His commitment to delivering transformative results while maintaining the highest standards of patient care has solidified his reputation
Schedule Your Consultation
Dr. Stephen E. Metzinger
May 13, 2026