
The main difference between deep plane and SMAS facelifts lies in the surgical approach to the face’s underlying structures: a SMAS facelift lifts and tightens the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System by folding or trimming it, while a deep plane facelift works beneath this layer, releasing key facial ligaments to reposition the SMAS, fat, and skin together as one cohesive unit. This fundamental difference influences the areas that can be treated, the nature of results, and recovery time.
Â
Â
The SMAS (Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System) is a fibrous network between the skin and deeper facial muscles that plays a crucial role in facial expression and structure. As we age, this layer stretches and descends, contributing to jowls and nasolabial folds.
Â
A SMAS facelift directly addresses this layer:
The surgeon separates the skin from the SMAS after making incisions
The SMAS layer is lifted and tightened through plication (folding) or imbrication (removing a section)
This reinforcement provides support for the overlying skin, creating smoother contours in the lower face and jawline
Â
The deep plane facelift operates within the anatomical space between the SMAS-muscle layer and the deeper expression muscles. Instead of separating skin from SMAS, the surgeon releases specific ligaments (zygomatic and masseteric) that tether the SMAS to deeper structures.
Â
This technique allows lifting of skin, fat, and SMAS as a single composite flap. The result is a powerful vertical lift addressing:
Jowls and neck
Sagging mid-face and cheeks
Deep nasolabial folds
Loss of cheek volume
Â
Customized Approach: Dr. Stephen Eric Metzinger tailors procedures based on his triple-board certification and extensive experience.
Â
The primary distinction lies in the plane of dissection:
Â
SMAS Lift:
Two layers of dissection
Skin lifted off SMAS, then SMAS lifted separately
Works in the superficial plane
Tension is placed on the SMAS layer itself
Shorter operative time with clear anatomical landmarks
Â
Deep Plane Lift:
One layer of dissection
Surgeon goes under the SMAS-muscle complex
Skin remains attached to the underlying muscle
Tension on deeper released tissues
Requires specialized training and longer operative time
Â
Deep plane facelifts generally provide more comprehensive lifting by releasing ligaments tethering the mid-face:
Elevates sagging cheeks and malar fat pads
Softens deep nasolabial folds
Corrects prominent jowling
Redefines jawline and neck angle
Creates smoother transitions between facial regions
SMAS lifts excel at addressing:
Lower face and neck laxity
Early to moderate jowling
Patients without significant cheek sagging
Â
Both techniques produce beautiful, natural results when performed by an experienced surgeon. The deep plane has structural advantages:
Unified tissue movement preserves natural expressions
Vertical lift counteracts gravity anatomically
Avoids “pulled” or “windswept” appearance
Maintains the integrity of facial tissue relationships
SMAS lifts deliver natural results when surgeons:
Avoid over-tightening
Properly redrape skin
Respect natural tissue vectors
Apply deep anatomical knowledge
Â
Both procedures require:
Anesthesia
Incisions hidden in the hairline and natural ear creases
Careful planning to minimize visible scarring
Key differences:
SMAS involves limited dissection in familiar planes
Deep plane requires extensive dissection around the facial nerves
Deep plane takes longer but allows more powerful repositioning
Â
Recovery timeline:
Initial results visible in 2-3 weeks
Return to work in 10-14 days
Final results develop over 3-6 months
Results last 8+ years with a healthy lifestyle
Recovery involves:
Swelling and bruising peaking on days 3-5
Compression garments
Specific sleeping positions
Feeling of tightness in the lower face and neck
Â
Recovery characteristics:
Similar timeline to SMAS
Potentially less bruising (avascular plane)
More initial swelling due to tissue mobilization
Less skin tension may improve scar healing
Most feel presentable after 2-3 weeks
Results often:
Appear more dramatic
Last 10-15 years
Continue settling beautifully over 6-12 months
Age more naturally over time
Â
Ages 40s-60s typically
Good skin elasticity
Moderate jowling
Primarily lower face aging
Minimal midface descent
Prefer shorter recovery
Â
Ages 50s-70s typically (individual anatomy matters more)
Advanced aging signs
Significant midface descent
Deep nasolabial folds
Loss of cheek volume
Seeking comprehensive, long-lasting results
Effective for both male and female patients
Â
The decision requires thorough evaluation at our Metairie practice. Dr. Metzinger examines:
Facial structure and bone structure
Skin quality and elasticity
Muscle tone and ligament laxity
Fat distribution
Specific aging patterns
Additional considerations include:
Personal aesthetic goals
Lifestyle factors
Recovery time availability
Result expectations
Â
Ultimately, the choice between a deep plane facelift and an SMAS facelift depends on your unique facial anatomy, aesthetic goals, and desired level of correction. While both techniques can deliver natural, rejuvenated results, a deep plane facelift may offer more comprehensive improvement for advanced facial aging and midface sagging, whereas a SMAS facelift is often ideal for patients seeking effective enhancement with a less extensive procedure.
Â
Consulting with an experienced plastic surgeon like Dr. Metzinger is the best way to determine which approach will provide the most balanced, youthful, and long-lasting outcome for you.

About the Author
